Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:16

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
NASA Is Planning to Build a Massive Telescope on the Moon’s Dark Side - The Daily Galaxy
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
James Webb Space Telescope unveils fiery origins of a distant, hellish exoplanet - Space
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
‘How To Train Your Dragon’ Flying In With $200M+ Worldwide Bow – International Box Office - Deadline
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
23andMe Sets New Auction With $305 Million New Bid From Ex-CEO - Bloomberg
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Has anyone ever made you take off your shirt?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.